Legal Opinion
Prince v. Sonnesyn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1946No. 34,220PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
Plaintiffs, Donald Prince and Gordon Jensen, and defendant Earl N. Sonnesyn were members of a partnership at will known as the Prince Manufacturing Company. Each had a one-third interest. On June 12, 1944, a corporation by the same name was organized to succeed to the partnership. Sonnesyn acquired a controlling interest in the corporation. Plaintiffs, claiming that Sonnesyn fraudulently induced them to agree to incorporate and fraudulently acquired a controlling interest, brought action. They prevailed, and Sonnesyn appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Plai…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hoffman Motor Truck Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Magee v. OddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Estate of Bongard v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005
- Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Appletree Square I Ltd. Partnership v. Investmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Pedro v. PedroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.