Minneapolis Western Ry. Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company, William H. Truesdale receiver, and the Railway Transfer Company, from a judgment of the District Court of Hennepin County, Seagrave Smith, J., entered January 20, 189é, for the recovery of possession of a strip of land thirty three feet wide in lots 33 and 87 in Auditor^ Subdivision No. 39 and in lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, in block 102 in Minneapolis.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendants, the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company, William H. Truesdale receiver, and the Railway Transfer Company, from a judgment of the District Court of Hennepin County, Seagrave Smith, J., entered January 20, 189é, for the recovery of possession of a strip of land thirty three feet wide in lots 33 and 87 in Auditor^ Subdivision No. 39 and in lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, in block 102 in Minneapolis. The Minneapolis Mill Company in 1872 owned the land in dispute, and on June 13, 1891, conveyed it to the plaintiff, the Minneapolis Western Railway Company, and it brought this…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This is one of a series of cases between the plaintiff, or its grantor, the Minneapolis Mill Company, and the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company, involving the title to several tracts of land in Minneapolis, upon which the railway company, at various dates between 1875 and 1880, constructed and subsequently maintained certain spur tracks, under authority from the Mill Company, then the owner of the land. Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis, etc., Ry. Co., 46 Minn. 330, (48 N. W. 1132;) Id., 51 Minn. 304, (53 N.W. 639;) Id. 55 Minn. 371; (57 N. W. 64;) C. C. Washburn Flouring-Mills Co. v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Johnson v. SkillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Lamm v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Watson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Wilson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nowlin Lumber Co. v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Great Falls Water Works Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
- Naporra v. WeckwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Alstad v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Test Oil Co. v. LaTouretteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.