Legal Opinion

Nowlin Lumber Co. v. Wilson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1899PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Clare; Dodds, J. Bill by the Nowlin Lumber Company against Amelia B. Wilson to restrain interference with a logging railroad. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, J..Complainant and the defendant own adjoining lots of timbered land, different parcels of the complainant’s land being separated by the land of the defendant. Previous to the time that the defendant acquired title to her property, the complainant desired to construct a logging railroad across the land now owned by the defendant, so that it might transport timber, which it proposed to cut upon one of its parcels, to its sawmill, which was* located upon the other tract. It therefore addressed the following letter to Mr. Spencer, who then owned the land now owned by the defendant:

'…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cook v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Mumford v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Prince v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  4. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. First National Bank v. Vanden BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Munsch v. StelterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API