Legal Opinion

Palmer v. ITT Hancock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1991No. Docket 115556PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal by leave granted from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission, which modified a magistrate’s award of closed benefits by awarding plaintiff continuing benefits for a partial disability. In this appeal we have been asked to determine (1) the proper standard for this Court to utilize in reviewing decisions of the appellate commission, and (2) whether the appellate commission erred in modifying the magistrate’s closed award of benefits. In order to answer these questions it is necessary for us to analyze and understand the differing roles of the appellate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Aaron v. Michigan Boiler & EngineeringMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Holden v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connaway v. Welded Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Abbey v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon FoundryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Acox v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Makky v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Woody v. Cello-Foil ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API