Continental Baking Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 22, 1936 :
Fritz, J.
Upon this appeal the principal question is whether the evidence warrants the commission’s determination that Fay Drew was injured on August 31, 1933, while performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment, within the terms and provisions of sec. 102.03, Stats. It is undisputed that he was in the employment of the Continental Baking Company (hereinafter called the Baking Company) for four years prior to that date, but plaintiffs contend that on the night of his injury he was doing unauthorized acts in an unauthorized…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grant County Service Bureau, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Kenney v. Rockingham School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Peterman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Voswinkel v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.