Peterman v. Industrial Commission

The plaintiff now concedes that such of the findings as relate to the facts are supported by the evidence, and that under the statute, sec. 102.23, and the established law, they may not be disturbed on appeal. The plaintiff, however, contends that the following findings :(d) “That applicant, in taking hold of the shaft, was not performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment ;”(e) “That his action in taking hold of the shaft was out of idle curiosity and through no desire to perform service for respondent;”(f) “That applicant’s injury did not arise out of his employment,”

*355are…