Legal Opinion

B&S Marketing Enterprises, LLC v. Consumer Protection Division

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 4, 2003No. 1672 Sept. Term 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAUSER, Judge.

The appellants are B&S Marketing Enterprises, LLC, and S&B Marketing Enterprises, LLC and the two men, who operate and control these two entities, Louis R. Seo, Jr. and Frank A. Brown, Jr. 1 Using the trade names “Kash-2-U leasing” and “Cash-2-U leasing,” B&S and S&B Enterprises provide “quick cash” to Maryland consumers through a contractual contrivance appellants call a “sale-leaseback” but which might more aptly be described, under the circumstances in which it was typically presented and enforced, as a “sale-leaseback-repurchase” agreement.

It is the last stage of this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene v. ShrievesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. State Administration Board of Election Laws v. BillhimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MARYCLE, LLC. v. First Choice Internet, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. City of Annapolis v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. McClellan v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. TFG-Illinois, L.P. v. United Maintenance Co.District Court, D. Utah · 2011
  5. In the Matter of Cash-N-GoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API