In the Matter of Cash-N-Go
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
In the Matter of Cash-N-Go, Inc., ET AL., No. 1012, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Ripken, J. EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL – MARYLAND REGULATORY AGENCIES – APPLICABILITY State regulatory agencies should not be estopped from enforcing a valid law or regulation within the scope of their authority regardless of a claimant’s contention that unlawful business practices were justified by reliance upon prior statements or conduct of state employees. EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL – MARYLAND REGULATORY AGENCIES – AFFIRMATIVE MISCONDUCT A state regulatory agency becoming aware of a claimant’s illicit behavior and…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.