Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Cash-N-Go

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 1, 2022No. 1012/21Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the Matter of Cash-N-Go, Inc., ET AL., No. 1012, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Ripken, J. EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL – MARYLAND REGULATORY AGENCIES – APPLICABILITY State regulatory agencies should not be estopped from enforcing a valid law or regulation within the scope of their authority regardless of a claimant’s contention that unlawful business practices were justified by reliance upon prior statements or conduct of state employees. EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL – MARYLAND REGULATORY AGENCIES – AFFIRMATIVE MISCONDUCT A state regulatory agency becoming aware of a claimant’s illicit behavior and…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API