Legal Opinion
American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 27, 1930No. 6 Div. 382PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The suit was on a fire insurance policy. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appeals.
The complaint is substantially in Code form, and is sufficient. Commercial Fire Ins. Co. v. Capital City Ins. Co., 81 Ala. 320, 8 So. 222, 60 Am. Rep. 162.
We so construe its averments as disclosing the insurance policy issued direct to plaintiff as the assured. In proof of the complaint, plaintiff offered a policy issued to Mrs. Nattie Bailey which contained a New York standard loss payable clause to plaintiff as its interest may appear. We think the defendant’s objection to the introduction of this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steele v. Steele's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Commercial Fire Insurance v. Capital City InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Le Grand v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Yorkshire Ins. Co. v. GazisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Prine v. American Central Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Tennessee Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.