Legal Opinion
Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Raper
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 21, 1941No. 8. Div. 128PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appeal challenged the action of the trial court in entering a judgment for the plaintiff, or in failing or refusing to find the facts with reference to the ownership of the insured’s property and plaintiff’s interest therein, during the term of the policy sued on.
It is well established that in a proper case the appellate court should review the trial court on the sufficiency and correctness of its finding of facts. Shaw v. Knight, 212 Ala. 356, 102 So. 701; United States F. & G. Co., v. Yeilding Bros., etc., 225 Ala. 307, 143 So. 176.
The law as to violation of contract…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mooradian v. Canal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Headley v. HeadleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Union Marine General Ins. Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Bankers Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. DraperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Brewton v. Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.