Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Aaron

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1933No. 5 Div. 134PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action on a policy of fire insurance extending from January 7, 1928, to January 7, 1930. The loss occurred on May 20, 1929. Prior'to the issuance of the policy, two mortgages had been executed on the property. Plaintiff owned the second in priority. On the 5th of March, 1929, plaintiff took, up the first mortgage, and on that day a “loss payable” clause was attached to the policy, payable to plaintiff as his interest may appear, subject to all the conditions of the policy, thereby distinguished from those clauses which exempt the rights of the mortgagee from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Alabama State Mutual Assurance Co. v. Long Clothing & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Great American Ins. Co. v. DoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Royal Insur. Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. WilbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Cranford v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. &198tna Ins. Co. v. Baldwin Cty. Bldg. Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of NY v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API