Legal Opinion
National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Tennessee Land Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 21, 1932No. 6 Div. 896PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Demurrer to count 2, upon which the case was tried, was properly overruled. It sufficiently discloses in whose name the policy was issued, and the right of plaintiff to sue thereon. Prine v. American Cent. Ins. Co., 171 Ala. 343, 54 So. 547; American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lbr. Co., 221 Ala. 280, 128 So. 225.
Upon the merits, the theory of defendant is that recovery should be denied for the ¡reason that Bailey and Cummings had, previous to the issuance of the policy sued upon, sold and conveyed the property, and therefore the express provisions of the poliey as ;to the insured…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Western Assurance Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Ray v. Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Campbell Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Prudential Ins. Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Vardaman v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. LassetterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.