Legal Opinion

Le Grand v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1927No. 3 Div. 723PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoubdin, J.

The only question involved in this appeal is the priority of liens as between a garnishing creditor of a contractor and materialmen furnishing materials to the contractor for the erection of a building. An admitted unpaid balance due from the owner to the contractor was paid into court. This fund is the subject-matter of the suit.

The decree was upon an agreed statement of facts. The materialmen took all required steps to perfect their liens under the mechanic’s lien law. The lien of the garnishment attached prior to the giving of notice to the owner required of persons furnishing material or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Randolph v. Builders & Painters Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Ex parte SchmidtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Leftwich Lumber Co. v. Florence Mutual Building, Loan & Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Spengler v. Stiles-Tull Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Dixie Lumber Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Chapman v. Rivers Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Baker Sand & Gravel Co. v. Rogers Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Floyd v. RamboSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API