Legal Opinion

Pitts & Son Co. v. Bank of Shiloh

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1917No. 8167PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trover; from Harris superior court—Judge Munro. December 18, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The Bank of Shiloh brought suit against I. H. Pitts & Son Company, alleging that said firm was in possession of three bales of cotton, good' middling, weighing in the aggregate 1,625 pounds, which belonged to the'plaintiff and was worth $195; ■ that demand had been made on the defendant for the possession of .the said property, and that the plaintiff had tendered to the defendant all warehouse charges and insurance due for the storage and insurance of the said cotton, and that the defendant refused to deliver the property. The prayer of the petition was that “process may issue, requiring the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. WoodleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Bank of Blakely v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Bradley v. BurkettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Powell v. BlackstockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Thompson v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. BEN HYMAN & CO., INC. v. SolowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Williams v. Baggs Auto Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Morris v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API