Powell v. Blackstock
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
In a tort action the failure of the pleader, when praying that process issue and that the defendant be and appear to answer the petitioner’s complaint, to pray, verbatim et literatum, that "judgment be given” in a stipulated sum or sums, will not for that reason defeat the cause of action or render the court impotent to give judgment in the event of recovery. For .authority inferentially for this rule, see Pitts & Son Co. v. Bank of Shiloh, 20 Ga. App. 143 (2) (92 S. E. 775). Where the verdict may be returned in a single sum, though it be the aggregate of several items specified, judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Price v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KohlrussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Highway Department v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Adams v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Green v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Southern Railway Co. v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.