Legal Opinion

BEN HYMAN & CO., INC. v. Solow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1960No. 38120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

1. “A petition in a suit in trover impliedly alleges the plaintiff’s damages in the amount of the value of the property sued for. Pitts & Son Co. v. Bank of Shiloh, 20 Ga. App. 143 (2) (92 S. E. 775). A plea denying generally the allegations of the petition is therefore a denial of the plaintiff’s right to recover in the amount sued for, and therefore necessarily presents an issue, not only as to the plaintiff’s right to recover, but as to the amount of the plaintiff’s damage.” So uthern Timber Co. v. Bland, 32 Ga. App. 658 (5) (124 S. E. 359).

2. It is error to dismiss the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hargroves v. CookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  2. Redmond & Co. v. Atlanta & Birmingham Air-Line RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Pittman v. ColbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Southern Timber Co. v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Pitts & Son Co. v. Bank of ShilohCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mercer v. J. & M. TRANSPORTATION CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Thompson v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. SHAEF CHEMICAL CO., INC. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Anderson v. CheelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Morgan v. Consolidated Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API