Legal Opinion

O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. Woodley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 30, 1903PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Trover. Before Judge Reece. City court of Floyd county. November 3, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Woodley brought an action of trover against the O’Neill Manufacturing Company, to recover two mules, alleging that each of them was worth $125, and that their hire was worth 50 cents per day each. The defendant filed an answer denying all the material allegations of the petition; and set up by special plea that it held a mortgage executed by Clark Brothers to it, embracing six mules, the two in controversy being among the number; that there was a lien upon these mules both under the law of this State and under that of Alabama, where it had taken possession of the two mules in satisfaction of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Jaques v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Schley v. LyonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  4. Woods v. McCallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  5. Moore v. DutsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moultrie Repair Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Lott v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Rose City Foods Inc. v. Bank of Thomas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Beaver v. MagidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Bennett v. Tucker & PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API