Legal Opinion

Phoenix Technologies, Inc. v. TRW, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1993No. 92-CV-5863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the motion of defendant, TRW, Inc., to amend its counterclaim against plaintiff, Phoenix Technologies, Inc., pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff opposes this motion for three reasons: first, that the defendant delayed in filing this motion and there would be prejudice against plaintiff if defendant’s motion was granted; second, that the proposed counterclaim for fraud would be futile because an Agreement of Purchase and Sale between the parties entitles defendant only to retain…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Link v. Leadworks Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Campco Distributors, Inc. v. FriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Redick v. Kraft, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Van Dam Egg Co. v. Allendale Farms, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  3. ESI Montgomery County, Inc. v. Montenay International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Precision Printing Co. v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Elf Atochem North America, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API