Legal Opinion
ESI Montgomery County, Inc. v. Montenay International Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 14, 1995No. 94 Civ. 0119 (RLC)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER,' District Judge.
Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 15, F.R.Civ.P. and Rule 3 of the Local Rules for leave to file a second amended complaint to amend its cause of action based on § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“the 1933 act”), 15 U.S.C. § 111 (1988), and to add causes of action based on § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the 1934 act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j (1988); on Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1994); and on common law fraud. Defendants renew their motion for summary judgment and dismissal of the amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6),…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lewis v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re Dynegy, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- Vannest v. Sage, Rutty & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.