Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Oro Loma Sanitary District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1950No. Civ. 14365PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

In a representative action for declaratory relief to declare void a reassessment levied, and to enjoin the issuance of bonds thereon by defendant sanitary district, the court held the reassessment and bonds valid. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of defendants.

Question Presented

The primary question is whether the trial court and this court may go behind the board’s finding of jurisdiction to make the reassessment.

Pacts

In 1945, the district, in order to acquire rights of way and construct certain storm drainage work and improvements, levied an assessment of $118,501.86 against the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cake v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Cowart v. Union Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Brenkwitz v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Union Paving Co. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Hazon-Iny Development, Inc. v. UnkeferAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API