Legal Opinion

Trimming v. Howard

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1932No. 5881PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, C. J. —

Plaintiff and appellant, Albert Trimming, sought a judgment against defendant and respondent, W. F. Howard, a practicing physician and surgeon: he asked for general damages in the sum of $7,500 and special damages in the further sum of $2,565.50. He plead that respondent, having undertaken to treat him for spinal meningitis, attempted to inject into the patient’s spinal column by means of a hypodermic syringe needle a certain serum, but that in the operation he broke off a portion of said needle in appellant’s back, in the vicinity of the spinal column; that there after, for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hillock v. Idaho Title & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Carpenter v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API