Trimming v. Howard
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, C. J. —
Plaintiff and appellant, Albert Trimming, sought a judgment against defendant and respondent, W. F. Howard, a practicing physician and surgeon: he asked for general damages in the sum of $7,500 and special damages in the further sum of $2,565.50. He plead that respondent, having undertaken to treat him for spinal meningitis, attempted to inject into the patient’s spinal column by means of a hypodermic syringe needle a certain serum, but that in the operation he broke off a portion of said needle in appellant’s back, in the vicinity of the spinal column; that there after, for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Hillock v. Idaho Title & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Carpenter v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.