Legal Opinion

Breckler v. Thaler

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1978No. Civ. 52864PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

This is a dispute over fees, between attorneys who acted as cocounsel representing a plaintiff minor in a medical malpractice case. The minor’s case was settled, and pursuant to its power to approve such compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 372, the trial court apportioned between the plaintiff’s attorneys the attorneys’ fees which the defendant had agreed to pay. The court determined that the fees should be divided in the manner the attorneys had originally agreed between themselves, one-third to appellant Breckler and two-thirds to respondents Halpem and Thaler.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Superior Court of the State in and for S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McClearen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Mason v. Levy & Van BourgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Raff v. RaffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Tom E. MacUrdy v. Sikov & Love, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Chambers v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. UAP-COLUMBUS JV 326132 v. NesbittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API