Legal Opinion

Post v. Bregman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1998No. 15, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

This is a dispute between two lawyers over the division of one-third of a fee. A letter agreement called for petitioner, Alan F. Post, Chartered (Post), to receive 60% of the third and for Douglas Bregman and his firm (Bregman) to receive the other 40%. The remaining two-thirds of the fee was paid to another firm that is not involved in the instant dispute. When the underlying case that generated the fee was settled, Post received the entire one-third share, $260,000, and he then balked at paying Bregman the 40% called for in the letter agreement ($104,000), contending that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & LatimerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  2. County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Allied Investment Corp. v. JasenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API