Legal Opinion

Raff v. Raff

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1964No. L. A. 27695PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

On June 10, 1963, the trial court issued an interlocutory judgment of divorce declaring that plaintiff and defendant were each entitled to a divorce.

Defendant was ordered to pay “forthwith” to plaintiff’s attorneys additional fees of $5,000 and to pay directly to plaintiff alimony of $150 per month.

The court ruled that certain property, including four par cels of real estate, was community property and gave plaintiff and defendant 60 days from April 19, 1963, to make a settlement dividing this property. *

It further ordered that in the event no settlement was made, a receiver was to be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gilmaker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McLellan v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API