Drake v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM FRANKLIN. Appeal from the Chancery -Court of Franklin County. —T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchanan
Miss Drake filed her original bill against the railroad company above named, which the bill avers was incorporated under the laws of the State of Tennessee, and also against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company and the Illinois Central Railroad Compáhy, each of which, the bill avers, is a corporation under, the laws of the State of Illinois.
The bill is predicated upon the total loss of a carload of fruit trees valued at $1,125, owned by complainant and shipped by her from Winchester, Tennessee, under a bill of lading which named Toppenish, in the State of Washington, as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Deming & Co. v. Merchants' Cotton-press, etc., Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Railway Co. v. SowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Railroad v. Gilbert, Parkes & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. StoneTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Ward v. Gulf, M. N.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Marks v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Schaff v. HudginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.