Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Strickland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1929No. 2 Div. 941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The action is for a breach of contract for the shipment of live stock from a point in Wilcox county, Ala., on the line of the appellant Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company to Cook’s Station, Montgomery county, Ala., on the line of appellant Western Railway of Alabama. Each of the appellants separately filed a plea in abatement. That of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company is based upon the claim that the action is under section 10045 of the Code, and that section provides that such suit shall be filed in the county of the delivery, which was not done. Neither the complaint nor the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeatherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Eagle Iron Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Western Railway Co. v. HarwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. Ex Parte Fontaine Trailer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte GaunttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Ex Parte AU Hotel, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Roland Pugh Min. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API