Legal Opinion

Railroad v. Gilbert, Parkes & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1890PublishedCited by 16 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. W. K. McAlistek, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

On October 18, 1885, W. E. Embry, as agent of Gilbert, Parkes & Co., delivered seven bales of cotton to the Louisville and Hashville Railroad Company, at Columbia, Tenn., for shipment to his principals at Hashville.

Before its departui’e, and while yet in' the depot of the company at Columbia, the cotton was destroyed by fire.

■ Thereafter Gilbert, Parkes & Co. sued the railroad company for non-delivery. The action originated before a Justice of the Peace, from whose judgment there was • an appeal to the Circuit Court at Hashville. There the case was tried by his Honor, the Circuit Judge,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. York Company v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Bissell v. . New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Smith v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Schaller v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Pacific Express Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API