Legal Opinion

Railway Co. v. Sowell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1891PublishedCited by 19 opinions

PROM MAURY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Maury County. E. D. Patterson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

The defendant in error sued the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company for dam*19ages consequent upon an injury to a horse which he was having transported from Montgomery, Ala., to Columbia, Tenn., and which he alleged was injured by the negligence of the railroad company in eoui'se of transportation. He obtained verdict and judgment for $550.

The company moved for a. new trial, and, its motion being overruled, appealed, and assigned errors.

These go to the pleadings, evidence, and charge, but are all practically disposed of by a construction of the contract under which the shipment was made,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Donlon Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Alair v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Normile v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Ullman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Bird v. RailroadsTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API