Legal Opinion
Diamond v. New York, S. & W. R.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1937No. L-7384PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The defendant appearing specially for the sole purpose of the motion seeks to set aside the attempted service of summons and complaint as not in accordance with the law.
On February 10, 1937, the summons and complaint were served on one J. W. Van Cott, who it appears is the acting agent of the Consolidated Ticket Offices at 155 Pierrepont street, Brooklyn.
The defendant, a railroad company, is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of the states of Pennsylvania and New Jersey and duly authorized to do business within the state of New York. It has a place of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holzer v. . Dodge BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Goetz v. Interlake S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Lauricella v. Evening News Pub. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
- Appleby v. Insurance Office of Australia, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1922
- Collins v. Erie R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boston Medical Supply Co. v. Lea & FebigerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Cohen v. American Window Glass Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Schwartz v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
- Goldstein v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
- Klishewich v. Mediterranean Agencies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.