Legal Opinion
Goetz v. Interlake S. S. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1931PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The motion is granted.
I. This action is stated in the complaint to be based on section 33 of the so-called Jones Act, now title 46 (Shipping) U. S. Code, § 688 (46 USCA § 688). It is brought by the administrator, appointed by the county court of Campbell county, Ky., of a deceased seaman, a citizen of Kentucky, who in May, 1930, was employed by the Interlake Steamship Company, an Ohio corporation, on its steamship Verona. The defendants named are the employer steamship company and the Bethlehem Steel Corporation, a corporation of New Jersey.
The action was first begun…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Greenberg v. GIANNINICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Oldland v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Insurance Co. of North America v. S/S "Hellenic Challenger"District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Pou v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.