Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 10, 1950No. Civ. A. 4650, 4651PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Chief Judge.
Each of the two actions above noted involve the same questions of law, and they will be considered together.
This is a motion by the defendant for dismissal of the action upon the ground that the service was ineffective to secure jurisdiction of said defendant, and that the court lacks jurisdiction of defendant; that the service of the summons and complaint was not made on a person authorized either by law or otherwise to receive such process in behalf of defendant.
This is an action in negligence, brought to recover damages alleged to have arisen from injuries sustained by…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hayman v. Southern Pacific CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Allegue v. Gulf & South American S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Hershel Radio Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Wiederhorn v. Sands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.