Saarstahl Ag v. United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Inland Steel Bar Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge MAYER. Circuit Judge PLAGER concurs in the result.
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Saarstahl AG (“Saarstahl”) and the United States appeal the judgment of the Court of International Trade, Court No. 93-04-00219, Saarstahl AG v. United States, 984 F.Supp. 616 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1997) (“Saarstahl VII”), affirming the final determination of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in Certain Hot Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products from Germany, 58 Fed.Reg. 6233 (Dep’t Comm. Jan. 27,1993) (final affirm, determ.) (“Final Lead Bar”), as modified on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Intrepid v. Mamie E. Pollock, District Director of Customs, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- British Steel PLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Saarstahl Ag v. United States v. Inland Steel Bar CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- British Steel PLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Committee for Fairly Traded Venezuelan Cement v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Peretz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.