Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Marzec v. Public Employees' Retirement System

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2015No. B246667, B246671PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EDMON, P. J.

These consolidated appeals concern the calculation of retirement benefits under the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Government Code section 20000 et seq. Plaintiffs are former police officers and firefighters employed by local public agencies that provide employee retirement benefits through California’s Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). In order to enhance their service retirement benefits, plaintiffs purchased additional years of service credit through one of several optional programs offered by CalPERS. Subsequently, each plaintiff was disabled on…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. Stanislaus County Employees' Retirement Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Aluma Systems Concrete Construction of California v. Nibbi Bros.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Paxton v. Bd. of Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Beryl v. Navient CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  5. Cal Fire Local 2881 v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API