Legal Opinion
Forrester v. Roth's I. G. A. Foodliner, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 24, 1979No. Civ. 78-740PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES M. BURNS, District Judge:
On August 10, 1978, plaintiff (Forrester) filed this case, asserting a claim against defendant Roth’s IGA Foodliner, Inc. (Roth’s), under 29 U.S.C. §§ 207 and 216(b) for recovery of $20,648.16 in unpaid overtime compensation for the period from May 30, 1976, through May 29, 1978. Forrester also requested an equal amount in liquidated damages plus an award of attorney fees. On April 13, 1979, defendant moved for summary (or partial summary) judgment on four issues. Defendant’s motion claimed:
a) Plaintiff’s claim is barred by the applicable collective…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Billy H. Forrester v. Roth's I. G. A. Foodliner, Incorporated, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Wahl v. City of Wichita, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Nieddu v. Lifetime Fitness, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Seever v. Carrols Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Krouse v. Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.