Legal Opinion
Krouse v. Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 19, 2011No. Civil No. 10-111-HAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
Plaintiff brought suit against defendants asserting claims arising out of the circumstances of his termination of employment with his former employer, defendant Ply Gem Pacific Windows Corporation (Ply Gem). Plaintiff began working for Ply Gem’s predecessor in early February 1997 as a window technician. He was terminated in February 2009. Plaintiff alleges, in part, that he was pressured to refrain from documenting the overtime hours he worked. Other details from the factual background of this case will be evaluated as necessary.
Plaintiffs Complaint…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penny Bachelder Mark Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Xin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Oregon State Motor Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neighorn v. Quest Health CareDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Huitt v. Optum Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Brinkman v. Abm Onsite Servs. W., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Thomas v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023