Legal Opinion
Smith v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1989No. B035833PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
I
Preliminary Statement
This appeal involves the denial of a conditional use permit (hereafter CUP) to operate an adult cabaret, an establishment which offers nude or semi-nude entertainment. The court below, the Honorable Miriam A. Vogel judge presiding, denied the petition of appellant T.M. Smith, doing business as The Shangri-la (hereafter Smith) for a writ of mandate to set aside the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors’ (hereafter Board) denial of the CUP, finding, among other things, that the Board’s action was based upon substantial evidence. We affirm.
II
Issues…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Desmond v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Goat Hill Tavern v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Malibu Mountains Recreation, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.