Legal Opinion
Malibu Mountains Recreation, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1998No. B118524PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, J.
The regional planning commission (Commission) of respondent Los Angeles County (County) revoked the conditional use permit of a tennis ranch in the Santa Monica Mountains. In a subsequent hearing, the board of supervisors reached the same result. The owner of the property, appellant Malibu Mountains Racquet Club, then filed a petition for administrative mandamus and a complaint for damages for deprivation of civil rights and inverse condemnation. The matter was bifurcated, with the mandamus action being heard first. The trial court denied the petition for mandamus and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pool v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Desmond v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Northern Inyo Hospital v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bauer v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kalway v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Inzana v. Turlock Irrigation Dist. Bd. of Dirs., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Park At Cross Creek, LLC v. City of Mali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.