Legal Opinion
Smith v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1994No. B072488PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J .
For a second time, appellant seeks a conditional use permit (CUP) for a nude dancing cabaret. The application is for the same location the cabaret formerly occupied in an unincorporated area of the county near the cities of Azusa and West Covina. In a published opinion filed in 1989, this court affirmed a denial of appellant’s prior CUP application for this property (Smith v. County of Los Angeles (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 188 [259 Cal.Rptr. 231]). This time, however, appellant raises a new issue, the constitutionality of the Los Angeles County ordinance under which he was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Briggs v. City of Rolling Hills EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- SP Star Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- E.W.A.P., Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Gammoh v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Nunez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.