Legal Opinion

Will v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1951No. 38,402PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

Defendants, a brother and sister, appeal from a judgment rendered against each of them for actual and punitive, damages in an action instituted by a tenant of farm land.

The amended petition of Marvin Will, in substance, alleged: He was a tenant under an oral lease from August, 1947, to August, 1949, of a forty-acre tract of land in Morris county which was rented by the owner, Margaret Hughes; on or about July 5, 1949, James Hughes, a duly authorized agent of the defendant, Margaret Hughes, wrongfully entered, broke in upon and interrupted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motor Equipment Co. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Aultman Thrashing & Engine Co. v. KnollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Kerby v. HiestermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Hartwell v. Equitable Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Claggett v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Sampson v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API