United States v. Thomas Stanko Marks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals the dismissal with prejudice of an indictment charging Thomas Stanko Marks with possession of firearms and ammunition by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court held that Marks’ predicate state conviction was unconstitutional, because he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his attorney’s actual conflict of interest in jointly representing both defendants. Since Washington law forbids the use of an unconstitutional conviction as a predicate for subsequent criminal prosecutions, the court dismissed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Daniels v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Sabri YakouCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Peter Santos MurilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. AnkenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Cabrera-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.