United States v. Ankeny
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
ORDER
The government’s request for clarification is GRANTED. The opinion filed on June 19, 2007, is amended as follows:
*832On slip opinion page 7239 (490 F.3d 744, 756), replace the last sentence of footnote 7 with:
We need not decide whether the amendment applies retroactively, though, because the government — despite later assertions to the contrary — never argued in briefing or oral argument that the amendment should apply retroactively. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Terebesi v. TorresoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- United States v. SnellenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. RockfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- United States v. DayeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Z. J. v. Kansas City Brd of Police CommCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.