Legal Opinion

United States v. Ankeny

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2007No. 05-30457PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.

ORDER

The government’s request for clarification is GRANTED. The opinion filed on June 19, 2007, is amended as follows:

*832On slip opinion page 7239 (490 F.3d 744, 756), replace the last sentence of footnote 7 with:

We need not decide whether the amendment applies retroactively, though, because the government — despite later assertions to the contrary — never argued in briefing or oral argument that the amendment should apply retroactively. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Terebesi v. TorresoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. SnellenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. RockfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. United States v. DayeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Z. J. v. Kansas City Brd of Police CommCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API