Legal Opinion
Daniels v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 25, 2001No. 99-9136PublishedCited by 426 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
In Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (1994), we addressed whether a defendant sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (ACCA), 18 U. S. C. § 924(e), could collaterally attack the validity of previous state convictions used to enhance his federal sentence. We held that, with the sole exception of convictions obtained in violation of the right to counsel, a defendant has no right to bring such a challenge in his federal sentencing proceeding. 511 U.S., at 487. We now consider whether, after the sentencing proceeding has concluded, the individual who was sentenced may challenge…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by426 opinions
- Elizalde v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wall v. KholiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Donald Mallett, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
421 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.