Legal Opinion
United States v. Isidro Moreno-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 2005No. 03-30387PublishedCited by 279 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The mandate issued on July 13, 2005 is recalled for the purpose of amending the opinion as follows:
The amended opinion filed July 5, 2005, slip op. 7773, appearing at 2005 WL 1560269 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005), is amended as follows:
1) Slip op. at 7793 (2005 WL 1560269, at *9): The first sentence of the third full paragraph, beginning “We conclude that a limited remand is proper in all pending direct criminal appeals involving unpreserved Booker error,” is deleted. In its place, the following sentence is inserted: “We conclude that defendants are entitled to limited…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by279 opinions
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Sylvester Norman Knows His Gun, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jesus Adrian Beng-SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Javier Velasquez-Reyes, A.K.A. Javier Alvarado-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Blaine Travis FifieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.