Legal Opinion
In Re Tayler F.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 8, 2010No. SC 18280PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The underlying neglect proceeding in the present case requires us to consider whether, and under what circumstances, a child witness may be deemed unavailable for purposes of admitting the child’s out-of-court statements under the residual exception to the hearsay rule when it is claimed that testifying would be psychologically harmful to the child. The respondent mother 1 appeals, upon our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgments adjudicating her minor children neglected. In re Tayler F., 111 Conn. App. 28, 958 A.2d…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BeadleWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Gould v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Department of Child Safety v. BeeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. Devon D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- In re Jayce O.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.