Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Williams
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
—This is an appeal from a judgment denying an application for a writ of mandate to require the respondent auditor to draw a warrant upon a claim for cement furnished by the petitioner to the county of Sacramento, which claim has been duly approved by the board of supervisors, The cement was purchased by the purchasing agent of the county without advertising for bids, for the purpose of constructing certain highways in the county of Sacramento. The improvement of these highways was provided for by a county bond issue of one million seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars at an election held…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Perry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Bay Rock Company v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Walton v. McPhetridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1989