Legal Opinion

Berry v. McLeod

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1979No. 14161PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

This appeal arises from the successful efforts of Virginia McLeod, personal representative of the estate of Richard McLeod, deceased, to set aside the sales agreements in two separate but related real estate transactions. Although a number of parties were joined in the action in the trial court, only two of the parties, Richard Berry and his wife and Stewart Title and Trust of Phoenix, have appealed. We took jurisdiction of the appeal pursuant to former Supreme Court Rule 47(e)(5), now Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

The essential facts of the claim…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tuscon Title Insurance Company v. D'AscoliArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brand v. JH Rose Trucking CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Blackburn v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Lee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Malta v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. American State Bank v. AdkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API