Welch v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fbomme, J.:
This appeal is on the question of whether an insured injured party covered by two insurance policies, each providing uninsured motorist coverage mandated by K. S. A. 40-284, is entitled to receive a total of $30,000.00 on the two policies when the actual damages oaused by the fault of the uninsured motorist were only $20,000.00. The question is purely one of law for the findings of fact made by the trial court were aocepted by the parties.
In the interest of brevity we summarize the court’s findings in order to present the facts necessary to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bartee v. R.T.C. Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Davis v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Farmers Insurance v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- Patrons Mutual Ins. Ass'n v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Eidemiller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.