Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1990No. 64,220PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

This is a declaratory judgment action brought by Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., to determine whether Stephen Gilbert, its insured, is entitled to underinsured motorist benefits for injuries he received while riding his motorcycle. Gilbert contends that he is entitled to benefits under the uninsured motorist coverage provided by his automobile liability policies. Farmers contends that Gilbert’s motorcycle policy is the only applicable policy and that no benefits are due thereunder. The trial court granted summary judgment for Farmers. Gilbert appeals. We reverse.

The parties…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. DeWitt v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ball Ex Rel. Ball v. Midwestern InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Eidemiller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Farmers Insurance v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Larry Lee Walker, John P. Biscanin, Esq., Administrator of the Estate of Irma J. Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Dupin v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API