Legal Opinion
White v. Luber
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 19, 1958No. 2226PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Acting Judge.
The trial court ordered summary judgment against defendants as makers of a second trust note, of which plaintiff claimed to be holder in due course. The judgment was granted after plaintiff had answered certain interrogatories, after pretrial, and after defendants had filed an amended answer. Defendants have brought the case here for review.
The complaint was in the usual form and recited that the payees of the note had endorsed it to plaintiff, that plaintiff was holder in due course and for value, and that the note was in default. The amended answer recited that the note…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- James Alvado v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cooke v. Griffiths-Garcia Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Toomey v. CammackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Lumpkins v. CSL LOCKSMITH, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Alger Corporation v. WesleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Blyther v. Pentagon Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.