Legal Opinion

Mays v. Alumnitec, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 2001No. CA 01-591PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karen Baker, Judge.

Appellant, Angel Mays, brings this appeal from a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Commission. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied appellant’s claim for compensation based on a lack of objective findings. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s decision. On appeal, appellant argues that the Commission erred in determining that straight-leg-raising tests and range-of-motion tests were not objective findings for the purpose of determining compensability. We disagree.

Appellant was employed as a packer at Alumnitec on May 18, 2000, when she suffered an injury to her lower…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estridge v. Waste ManagementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. McMillan v. U.S. MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Oliver v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Duke v. Regis HairstylistsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Hayes v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parker v. Comcast Cable Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Powers v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Watson v. Tayco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Continental Construction Co. v. NaborsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API